0
You have no items in your shopping cart.
Search
Actions
List of Forms
- You must be a paid subscriber to access the downloads
Table of Contents
-
Chapter 1 — Arrest, Search, and Seizure - Chapter 2 — Representing Clients in the Early Stages of a Criminal Action
- Chapter 3 — Confessions
- Chapter 4 — Illinois Criminal Pretrial Discovery
- Chapter 5 — Pretrial Motions
- Chapter 6 — Cybercrimes and Use of E-Evidence in Criminal Cases
- Chapter 7 — Psychological Issues and Defenses
- Chapter 8 — Affirmative Defenses in Illinois
- Chapter 9 — Plea and Sentencing Bargaining
- Chapter 10 — Trial Preparation and Strategy
- Chapter 11 — Jury Issues
- Chapter 12 — Trial Legal Issues
- Chapter 13 — Evidence
- Chapter 14 — Preserving the Record
- Chapter 15 — Criminal Sentencing in Illinois
- Chapter 16 — The Criminal Appeal
- Chapter 17 — Illinois Post-Conviction Hearing Act
- Chapter 18 — Habeas Corpus
-
I. Preliminary Considerations - II. [18.4] Introduction
- [18.5] Nature of the Remedy
- [18.6] The Place of Habeas Corpus in the Criminal Process
- [18.7] First Stage — Direct Appeal
- [18.8] Second Stage — State Collateral Review
- [18.9] Third Stage — Federal Collateral Review
- [18.10] A Bit of History — The Common-Law Writ
- [18.11] More History — The Statutory Habeas Power
- [18.12] Current Federal Habeas Corpus Statutes
- [18.13] 28 U.S.C. §2254
- [18.14] 28 U.S.C. §2241, et seq.
- [18.15] 28 U.S.C. §2255
- [18.16] Governing Rules
- [18.17] Rules Governing §2254 Cases in the United States District Courts
- [18.18] Rules Governing §2255 Proceedings for the United States District Courts
- [18.19] Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure
- [18.20] Circuit Rules
- [18.21] Applicability of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to §2254 Proceedings
- Local Rules
- [18.22] Capital Habeas Rules for the Seventh Circuit
- [18.23] Northern District of Illinois
- [18.24] Central District of Illinois
- [18.25] Southern District of Illinois
- III. Initiating the Case Under §2254
- [18.26] Pro Se Petitioners
- [18.27] Appointment of Counsel
- [18.28] In Non-Death Penalty Cases
- [18.29] In Death Penalty Cases
- [18.30] Pro Se Petition
- [18.31] Notice of Intent
- [18.32] McFarland Motion by Counsel
- [18.33] What attorney should request appointment?
- [18.34] Conflict
- [18.35] Qualifications
- [18.36] Filing the motion
- [18.37] Contents of motion for appointment
- Compensation of Appointed Counsel
- [18.38] In Non-Death Penalty Cases
- [18.39] In Death Penalty Cases
- [18.40] Summary
- IV. [18.41] Statute of Limitations
- Calculation
- [18.42] Computation
- Initiation
- [18.43] Convictions Final After April 24, 1996
- [18.44] Convictions Final Before April 24, 1996
- [18.45] Mailbox Rule
- [18.46] 180-Day Statute of Limitations Under §2263 Inapplicable
- [18.47] Effect of Untimely Filing
- [18.48] Tolling
- [18.49] Statutory Tolling
- [18.50] “Properly Filed”
- [18.51] “State Post-Conviction or Other Collateral Review”
- [18.52] “With Respect to the Pertinent Judgment or Claim”
- [18.53] “Pending”
- [18.54] Equitable Tolling
- [18.55] Equitable Tolling Found
- [18.56] Equitable Tolling Not Found
- [18.57] Actual Innocence as Grounds for Equitable Tolling
- [18.58] Waiver of Statute of Limitations
- V. Investigation of the Petition
- VI. Preparation of the Petition
- [18.64] Clerk’s Form
- [18.65] Attorney Petitions
- [18.66] Caption
- [18.67] Citation of Authority
- [18.68] Constitutional Basis and Supreme Court Authority for Claim
- [18.69] Further Discussion of Authority
- [18.70] Procedural History
- [18.71] Statement of Facts
- [18.72] Statement of the Claim
- [18.73] Conclusion
- [18.74] Verification
- [18.75] Exhibits
- VII. Filing the Petition
- VIII. Initial Proceedings on the Petition
- Assignment
- [18.87] District
- [18.88] Division
- [18.89] Judge
- [18.90] Magistrate Judge
- [18.91] Capital Habeas Rules for the Seventh Circuit
- [18.92] Local Rules — Northern District
- [18.93] Local Rules — Southern District
- [18.94] Local Rules — Central District
- [18.95] Preliminary Consideration — Summary Dismissal
- [18.96] Initial Proceedings in Death Penalty Cases
- [18.97] Capital Habeas Rules for the Seventh Circuit
- [18.98] Local Rules
- Scheduling
- [18.99] Generally
- [18.100] Opt-In Schedule for Death Penalty Cases Inapplicable to Illinois Petitioners
- IX. Special Problem Filings
- X. Amendment
- XI. Responsive Pleadings
- XII. [18.117] The State Court Record
- XIII. [18.124] Legal Issues
- Procedural Issues
- [18.125] Exhaustion of State Remedies
- [18.126] Mixed Petitions
- [18.127] Dismissal Without Prejudice
- [18.128] Stay of Proceedings
- [18.129] Waiver of Exhaustion Requirement
- [18.130] State Procedural Default
- [18.131] “Independent” State Grounds
- [18.132] “Adequate” State Grounds
- [18.133] Merits Determination in State Courts
- [18.134] Burden
- [18.135] Cause and Prejudice as a Defense to State Procedural Bar
- [18.136] Cause
- [18.137] Prejudice
- [18.138] Miscarriage of Justice as a Defense to State Procedural Bar
- [18.139] Forfeiture of State Procedural Default
- Substantive Issues
- [18.140] Standard for Relief
- [18.141] Claims Adjudicated on the Merits in State Court Proceedings
- [18.142] State Court Decisions Contrary to, or Unreasonably Applying, United States Supreme Court Law
- [18.143] The “contrary to” and “unreasonable application of” clauses
- [18.144] The “clearly established Federal law” and “Supreme Court of the United States” clauses
- [18.145] Unreasonable Determination of the Facts
- [18.146] New Rules — Retroactivity
- [18.147] State Findings of Fact Presumed Correct
- [18.148] Harmless Error
- Special Substantive Issues
- [18.149] Ineffective Assistance of Counsel
- [18.150] Fourth Amendment Claims
- XIV. [18.151] Discovery
- XV. [18.152] Expansion of the Record
- XVI. Evidentiary Hearing
- XVII. Relief
- XVIII. Appeal
- XIX. [18.168] Clemency
- XX. [18.169] Habeas Corpus for State Prisoners Under 28 U.S.C. §2241
- XXI. [18.170] Habeas Corpus for Federal Prisoners Under 28 U.S.C. §2255
- XXII. [18.171] Illinois State Habeas Corpus
- XXIII. [18.172] Ministerial Habeas Corpus
- XXIV. [18.173] Sources
- XXV. Appendix
- Sample Motions, Pleadings, and Orders in the District Court
- [18.183] Motion for Appointment of Counsel
- [18.184] Motion for Leave To Incur Expenses
- [18.185] Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum
- [18.186] Order for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum
- [18.187] Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum
- Sample Documents for Appeal
- [18.188] Notice of Appeal
- [18.189] Docketing Statement
- Sample Motions, Pleadings, and Orders in the Illinois Supreme Court
- [18.190] Motion for Stay of Execution During Habeas Corpus Proceedings
- [18.191] Order for Stay of Execution During Habeas Corpus Proceedings
- [18.192] Status Report
- Chapter 19 — Appendix — Criminal Law Practitioners Beware: That Supposed “Non-Conviction” of Supervision May Count as a Conviction for Federal Purposes
- Index
- Table of Cases
- List of Forms
Authors
- Anna M. Ahronheim
- David P. Bergschneider
- Patrick Cassidy
- Santiago A. Durango
- Richard Dvorak
- Leonard C. Goodman
- Fletcher P. Hamill
- Lawrence J. Heinrich
- Marijane Hemza-Placek
- Rachel J. Hess
- Stuart P. Katz
- Thomas A. Lilien
- Andrea D. Lyon
- Crystal H. Marchigiani
- Melissa A. Matuzak
- Darren E. Miller
- Alison H. Motta
- Robert M. Motta
- Robert M. Motta II
- Kathleen M. Pantle
- Stephen L. Richards
- Joshua Sachs
- James A. Shapiro
- Sherry Silvern
- Josette Skelnik
- Jed H. Stone
- Nancy Vincent
- Daniel J. Walsh
- Jay Wiegman
Defending Illinois Criminal Cases (ARCHIVED 2010 EDITION & 2013 SUPPLEMENT)
An IICLE® Online Library subscription is required to view this content. For more information or to subscribe, click here.