- PROGRAMS
- PUBLICATIONSCloseBack
- SUBSCRIPTIONS
- RESOURCE HUBCloseBack
- ABOUT US
- PROGRAMS
- PUBLICATIONSCloseBack
- SUBSCRIPTIONS
- RESOURCE HUBCloseBack
- ABOUT US
- You must be a paid subscriber to access the downloads
-
List of Forms by Chapter - Chapter 1 — Physical Injuries: Plaintiff’s Perspective
- I. [1.1] Scope of Chapter
- II. [1.2] General Considerations
- III. [1.3] Recoverable Damages
- IV. [1.4] Initial Client Interview
-
V. [1.5] Documenting Physical Injuries - VI. [1.11] Pleading
- VII. [1.12] Discovery
- VIII. [1.21] Burden of Proof
- IX. [1.22] Motions in Limine
- X. [1.23] Technology in the Courtroom
- XI. [1.24] Jury Instructions
- XII. [1.25] Closing Arguments
- XIII. [1.26] Conclusion
- XIV. Appendix — Sample Forms
- [1.27] Authorization for Release of Medical Record Information
- [1.28] Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act Request for Medical Records
- [1.29] Complaint Seeking Production of Medical Records
- [1.30] Supreme Court Rule 214 Request To Produce
- [1.31] Supreme Court Rule 237 Notice To Produce
- [1.32] Supreme Court Rule 216 Request To Admit
- Chapter 2 — Physical Injuries: Defendant’s Perspective
- I. [2.1] Scope of Chapter
- II. [2.2] General Considerations and Theories of Recovery
- III. [2.3] Liability and Defenses
- IV. [2.8] Proving and Disproving Recoverable Damages
- [2.9] Recoverable Damages
- Proving Damages
- [2.10] Amount of Damages Is a Question of Fact
- [2.11] Standard of Proof
- Aggravation of Preexisting Ailment, Condition, or Injury
- [2.12] Aggravation of Preexisting Condition or Ailment Not Separately Compensable
- [2.13] Jury Instructions
- [2.14] Practice Notes
- [2.15] Expert Testimony and “Same Part of the Body” Rule
- [2.16] Prejudgment Interest
- V. Defenses and Limitations on Recoverable Damages
- VI. Discovery
- [2.24] In General
- [2.25] General Discovery Provisions, Pretrial Procedure, and Refusal To Comply with Discovery and Pretrial Procedure
- [2.26] Disclosures Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 213(f)(3)
- [2.27] Requests for Admissions of Fact and Genuineness of Documents Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 216
- [2.28] Depositions Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 204
- [2.29] Independent Examination Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 215
- VII. [2.30] Limiting Recovery at Trial: Motions in Limine
- Chapter 3 — Psychological Injuries: Plaintiff’s Perspective
- I. [3.1] Introduction
- II. [3.2] Defining Pain and Suffering
- III. [3.3] Medical History
- IV. [3.4] Conscious Pain and Suffering
- V. [3.7] Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
- VI. Future Pain and Suffering
- VII. [3.12] Pre-Impact Pain and Suffering
- VIII. [3.15] Treating Physician Testimony
- IX. [3.16] Economists
- X. [3.17] Lay Witnesses
- XI. [3.18] Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
- XII. [3.19] Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress
- XIII. [3.20] Zone of Danger Rule
- XIV. [3.21] Possible Transmission of Human Immunodeficiency Virus
- XV. [3.22] Conclusion
- Chapter 4 — Psychological Injuries: Defendant’s Perspective
- Chapter 5 — Impaired Earning Capacity: Plaintiff’s Perspective
- I. [5.1] Scope of Chapter
- II. [5.2] Introduction
- III. [5.3] Individualized Nature of Injury
- IV. Standard of Proof in Determining Damages: Reasonable Certainty
- V. [5.10] Measuring Damages: Formula for Estimating Impaired Earning Capacity
- VI. [5.16] Final Considerations To Ensure Receipt of Adequate Damages for Impaired Earning Capacity
- VII. [5.17] Conclusion
- Chapter 6 — Impaired Earning Capacity: Defendant’s Perspective
- I. [6.1] Scope of Chapter
- II. [6.2] Distinguishing Impaired Earning Capacity and Lost Wages
- III. Understanding and Disproving Plaintiff’s Alleged Physical Impairment
- [6.3] Interrogatories
- [6.4] Requests for Production
- Analyzing Plaintiff’s Medical, Employment, and Financial Records
- [6.5] Medical Records
- [6.6] Employment Records
- [6.7] Financial Data
- [6.8] Plaintiff’s Deposition
- [6.9] Deposing Plaintiff’s Treating Physicians
- [6.10] Court-Ordered Medical Examination
- [6.11] Experts
- [6.12] Surveillance of Plaintiff
- IV. Challenging the Measure of Plaintiff’s Loss
- V. [6.15] Conclusion
- Chapter 7 — How Economists Estimate the Present Value of Diminished Earnings Capacity
- I. [7.1] Introduction
- II. Pecuniary Value of Human Capital
- III. [7.4] Appraising Pecuniary Loss in Disability and Death Actions: Valuation Methods
- [7.5] Valuation Logic
- [7.6] Elements of Compensation
- [7.7] Estimating the Present Value of a Worker’s Future Earnings
- [7.8] Present Value of an Income Stream
- [7.9] Selecting the Appropriate Wage Growth Rate and Discount Rate
- [7.10] What Is the Appropriate Discount or Interest Rate To Use?
- [7.11] Risk-Return Trade-Off
- [7.12] Covariance Between Short-Term Interest Rates and Wage Growth Rates
- [7.13] Objective Market Evidence Relating to the (i-g) Differential
- [7.14] Reduction for a Decedent’s Terminated Consumption
- [7.15] Valuing Nonpaid Work Services to Household
- IV. [7.16] Working with an Economist
- V. [7.19] Socioeconomic Data Requirements
- Chapter 8 — Proving Special Damages: Medical Expenses and Lost Wages
- I. [8.1] Scope of Chapter
- II. Past Medical Expenses
- [8.2] Requisite Elements of Proof
- Means of Proving the Requisite Elements
- Testimony by the Plaintiff or Other Lay Witnesses
- [8.3] Pre-Arthur Rules
- [8.4] Post-Arthur Rules
- [8.5] Causation
- [8.6] Testimony by Treating Medical Professionals or Experts
- [8.7] Testimony by Lienholders
- [8.8] Stipulations and Documentary Means of Proving Past Medical Expenses
- [8.9] Free Medical Services
- Defense Attacks on Past Medical Expense
- [8.10] Inexact Bill
- [8.11] Unnecessary Treatment or Overtreatment
- [8.12] Unreasonableness of Expense
- [8.13] No Causation: Subsequent Injury or Reinjury
- [8.14] No Causation: Prior Injury; Aggravation Issues
- [8.15] Same Area of the Body
- [8.16] Different Areas of the Body
- [8.17] Damages for Aggravation of Preexisting Condition
- [8.18] Plaintiff’s Failure To Mitigate Damages
- [8.19] Collateral-Source Payment of Medical Expense
- III. Future Medical Expenses
- IV. [8.24] Past Lost Earnings
- V. Future Lost Earnings
- Chapter 9 — Punitive Damages: Plaintiff’s Perspective
- I. [9.1] Introduction
- II. [9.2] Purpose and Judicial Philosophy of Punitive Damages
- III. Availability of Punitive Damages
- [9.3] General Principles
- [9.4] Statutory Actions Providing for Punitive Damages
- Common-Law Actions Including Punitive Damages
- [9.5] In General
- [9.6] Willful and Wanton Misconduct
- [9.7] Intentional Acts
- [9.8] Products Liability
- [9.9] Fraud
- [9.10] Defamation
- [9.11] Invasion of Privacy
- [9.12] Retaliatory Discharge
- [9.13] Misconduct by Attorneys
- [9.14] Conversion
- [9.15] Intentional or Reckless Breach of Fiduciary Duty
- [9.16] Wrongful-Death and Survival Actions
- [9.17] Liability of Principal for Punitive Damages
- [9.18] Actions in Which Punitive Damages Are Unavailable
- [9.19] Contract Actions
- [9.20] Healing Art and Legal Malpractice
- [9.21] Local Governmental Tort Immunity
- [9.22] Actions Requiring Proof of Outrageous Conduct
- [9.23] Administrative Agencies
- [9.24] Other Actions in Which Punitive Damages Are Unavailable
- [9.25] Death of the Defendant
- [9.26] Assignment of Punitive Damage Claims
- IV. Procedure
- [9.27] Pleading
- [9.28] Form of Ad Damnum Praying Punitive Damages
- [9.29] Special Treatment of Negligence and Products Liability Cases
- Proof at Trial
- [9.30] General Principles
- [9.31] Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co. — A Case Study for Punitive Damages
- [9.32] Proof of Compensatory Damages
- [9.33] Proof of Defendant’s Worth
- [9.34] Proof of Substantially Similar Occurrences
- [9.35] Jury Instructions
- [9.36] Amount of Punitive Award and Standards of Review
- [9.37] Constitutional Challenges
- [9.38] Attempts at Legislative Reform
- [9.39] Arbitration Proceedings
- V. Pitfalls of Punitive Damages
- VI. [9.43] Appendix — Statutory Actions Allowing Recovery of Punitive Damages
- Chapter 10 — Punitive Damages: Defendant’s Perspective
- I. [10.1] Introduction
- II. Common-Law Grounds for the Imposition of Punitive Damages
- III. [10.5] Necessity of Proving Compensatory Damages To Recover Punitive Damages
- IV. Cases in Which Punitive Damages Are Not Allowed
- V. Pleadings and Discovery
- VI. Punitive Damages at Trial
- VII. Review of Punitive Damage Awards
- VIII. Constitutional Limitations on Punitive Damage Awards
- IX. [10.26] Conclusion
- Chapter 11 — Damages in a Wrongful-Death Case: Plaintiff’s Perspective
- I. [11.1] Introduction
- II. Wrongful Death Act
- III. [11.7] Damages Pursuant to the Wrongful Death Act
- [11.8] Limitations on Damages
- [11.9] Pecuniary Injuries
- [11.10] Pecuniary Loss — Definition
- [11.11] Presumption of Substantial Pecuniary Loss
- Elements of Pecuniary Loss
- [11.12] Money and Mortality Tables
- [11.13] Proving Loss of Future Earnings
- [11.14] Past Earnings
- [11.15] Future Earnings
- [11.16] Goods and Services
- [11.17] Loss of Society
- [11.18] Elements of Society
- [11.19] Who May Recover
- [11.20] Evidence To Establish Loss of Society
- [11.21] Funeral Expenses
- [11.22] Elements of Damages Factors Excluded
- [11.23] Discount of Future Damages
- [11.24] Subsequent Spouse or Child
- [11.25] Punitive Damages
- IV. [11.26] Prejudgment Interest
- V. Division of the Wrongful Death Award
- VI. [11.31] Plaintiff’s Practice Tips
- [11.32] Obtaining Medical Records of the Decedent Pre-Suit
- [11.33] Gathering Evidence of Pecuniary Injuries Pre-Suit
- [11.34] New Client Intake Meeting
- [11.35] Decedent’s Obituary
- [11.36] Social Media Presence
- [11.37] Interviews with the Surviving Spouse, Next of Kin, Friends, Extended Family, Neighbors, and Coworkers, Etc.
- [11.38] Tangible Evidence
- [11.39] Filing the Case
- [11.40] Discovery
- [11.41] Trial
- [11.42] Managing Family Dynamics During the Division of the Funds
- [11.43] Timely Resolution of the Case
- VII. [11.44] Further References
- Chapter 12 — Damages in a Wrongful-Death Case: Defendant’s Perspective
- I. [12.1] Introduction
- II. [12.2] Who Can Institute a Wrongful-Death Action?
- III. Individuals Entitled To Recover Under the Wrongful Death Act
- [12.3] Applicable Statutory Provisions and Illinois Pattern Jury Instructions
- [12.4] Surviving Spouse
- [12.5] Next of Kin
- [12.6] Offspring
- [12.7] Parents
- [12.8] Siblings
- [12.9] Grandchildren
- [12.10] Grandparents
- [12.11] Nieces and Nephews
- [12.12] Family of a Suicide
- Practice Tips
- [12.13] Discovery Issues
- [12.14] Probate Proceedings
- [12.15] Proper Notice to Persons Entitled To Recover
- IV. Recoverable Damages Under the Wrongful Death Act
- V. [12.23] Damages Not Recoverable Under the Wrongful Death Act
- VI. [12.33] Mitigation of Damages
- [12.34] Affirmative Defenses
- [12.35] Passage of Time
- [12.36] Quality of Filial Relationship
- [12.37] Expenditures for Child Rearing
- [12.38] Remarriage
- [12.39] Extramarital Affairs
- [12.40] Health of Decedent
- [12.41] Widow’s Right To Recover Decedent’s Benefits
- [12.42] Expert Opinion Witnesses: Economists and Annuitists
- [12.43] Potential Earnings of Decedent
- [12.44] Decedent’s Income at Time of Death
- [12.45] Decedent’s Occupation and Potential Wage Earnings
- [12.46] Decedent’s Industry, Sobriety, and Thrift
- [12.47] Present Cash Value
- Comparative Fault of Decedent or Contributory Negligence of Spouse or Next of Kin
- [12.48] Contributory Negligence of Spouse or Next of Kin
- [12.49] Comparative Fault of Decedent
- [12.50] Multiple Defendants
- [12.51] Timeliness of Filing a Wrongful-Death Claim
- [12.52] Calculation of Damages
- [12.53] Civil Justice Reform Amendments
- [12.54] Creditors’ Liens
- VII. Defense Practice Tips
- Chapter 13 — An Introduction to Neuropsychology for Personal Injury Practitioners
- I. [13.1] Introduction
- II. [13.2] What Is Neuropsychology?
- III. [13.3] Qualifications of a Neuropsychologist
- IV. [13.4] Areas Neuropsychological Testing Assesses
- V. [13.7] Neuropsychological Test Administration
- VI. Cognitive Domains Neuropsychologists Assess
- [13.8] What Is the Best Test To Answer My Question?
- [13.9] Why Do Neuropsychologists Give So Many Tests?
- [13.10] Orientation
- [13.11] Attention
- [13.12] Language
- [13.13] Memory
- [13.14] Executive Functioning
- [13.15] Visual-Spatial Functioning
- [13.16] Motor Functioning
- [13.17] Intellectual Functioning
- [13.18] Validity
- VII. [13.19] Diagnoses Commonly Seen in Personal Injury Law
- [13.20] Types of Cognitive Disorders
- [13.21] Traumatic Brain Injury
- [13.22] Physical Symptoms of Traumatic Brain Injury
- [13.23] The Course of Recovery in Traumatic Brain Injury
- [13.24] Cerebral Palsy
- [13.25] Causes of Cerebral Palsy
- [13.26] Hyperbilirubinemia
- [13.27] Oxygen deprivation
- [13.28] Symptoms of Cerebral Palsy
- [13.29] Motor functioning in cerebral palsy
- [13.30] Sensory functioning in cerebral palsy
- [13.31] Cognitive functioning in cerebral palsy
- [13.32] Toxin Exposure
- [13.33] Heavy Metals
- [13.34] Organic Solvents
- [13.35] Herbicides, Pesticides, and Other Chemicals
- [13.36] Carbon Monoxide
- [13.37] Types of Emotional Disorders
- [13.38] Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
- [13.39] Major Depressive Disorder
- [13.40] Anxiety Disorders
- [13.41] When Cognitive and Emotional Disorders Intersect
- [13.42] Depression and Traumatic Brain Injuries
- [13.43] Cognition and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
- [13.44] Substance Use, Cognitive Disorders, and Emotional Functioning
- [13.45] Cognition and Depression
- [13.46] Malingering
- [13.47] Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders
- VIII. [13.48] Admissibility of Neuropsychological Testing
- IX. Working with a Neuropsychologist
- X. [13.58] Understanding the Neuropsychological Report
- [13.59] Referral Information
- [13.60] Documents Reviewed
- [13.61] Legal Background
- [13.62] Background Information
- [13.63] Behavioral Observations
- [13.64] Statement of Validity
- [13.65] Tests Administered
- [13.66] Summary of Test Results
- [13.67] Conclusions, Summary, or Impressions
- [13.68] Diagnosis
- [13.69] Recommendations
- XI. [13.70] What Kind of Expert?
- XII. [13.73] Confidentiality Rules
- XIII. [13.80] Overview of Health Professions
- [13.81] General Practice Physicians
- [13.82] Specialist Physicians
- [13.83] Emergency Medicine Specialists
- [13.84] Hospitalists
- [13.85] Psychiatrists
- [13.86] Neurologists
- [13.87] Advanced Practice Providers
- [13.88] Counselors and Clinical Social Workers
- [13.89] Speech-Language Pathologists
- [13.90] Occupational Therapists
- [13.91] Physical Therapists
- [13.92] Clinical Psychologists
- [13.93] Clinical Neuropsychologists
- [13.94] Forensic Psychologists and Neuropsychologists
- XIV. [13.95] A Brief Overview of Neuroimaging
- XV. [13.98] Conclusion
- XVI. [13.99] Appendix — Frequently Used Neuropsychological Terms and Common Tests
- Colin A. Brietzke
Colin A. Brietzke
Colin A. Brietzke is the founder of Chicagoland Neuropsychology LLC, a multidisciplinary neuropsychological and neuroscientific assessment practice based in Oak Park. Dr. Brietzke’s areas of expertise include acquired brain injuries, dementia, and post-traumatic stress disorder. He has extensive experience assessing a wide range of legal competencies, as well as evaluating malingering and deception. He is a licensed clinical psychologist and a clinical neuropsychologist. His education includes a master’s degree in Forensic Psychology, a master’s degree in Clinical Psychology, and a doctorate in Clinical Psychology. Prior to entering private practice, Dr. Brietzke worked in a variety of clinical and forensic settings, including the DuPage County Probation Department and Elgin Mental Health Center’s Forensic Treatment Program.
- John A. Bruegger
John A. Bruegger
John A. Bruegger is a Partner at Parafinczuk Wolf in St. Louis, Missouri, where he focuses on mass torts, personal injury, wrongful death, and class actions. He is a member of the Missouri Association of Trial Attorneys and the American Association for Justice, and pro bono counsel for the Stand Up For Pits Foundation in Los Angeles, California. Mr. Bruegger received his J.D. and his J.S.D. in Jurisprudence from the Saint Louis University School of Law and his LL.M. in Taxation from the Washington University School of Law.
- Kevin J. Caplis
Kevin J. Caplis
Kevin J. Caplis is Of Counsel to Querrey & Harrow, Ltd., in Chicago, where he focuses his practice in construction liability, civil defense, and insurance coverage and arbitration. He is a member of the Illinois State Bar Association, the Federal Trial Bar, and the United States Supreme Court Bar. He has been named a Leading Lawyer and Super Lawyer and is a past President of the Trial Lawyers Club of Chicago. Mr. Caplis received his B.A. from the University of Illinois at Chicago and his J.D. from the DePaul University College of Law.
- Laura A. Castagna
Laura A. Castagna
Laura A. Castagnais a Partner at Kelly & Castagna in Bloomington, where she focuses on plaintiff’s personal injury. She is a member of the Illinois State Bar Association, the Illinois Trial Lawyers Association, and the Illinois Bar Foundation Board of Directors — Fourth District. Ms. Castagna received her B.A. from Eastern Illinois University, her M.A. from the University of Illinois at Springfield, and her J.D. from the Washington University in St. Louis School of Law.
- Julie L. Cibulskis
Julie L. Cibulskis
Julie L. Cibulskis is a Partner at Speers, Reuland & Cibulskis, P.C., in Aurora, where she focuses on civil litigation including personal injury, wrongful death, and commercial litigation. She is a past President and member of the of the Kane County Bar Association, a member of the Illinois Supreme Court Committee on Jury Instructions — Civil, and a member of the Illinois Supreme Court Committee on Character and Fitness — Second District. Ms. Cibulskis received her B.A. summa cum laude from Creighton University and her J.D. magna cum laude from the Seton Hall School of Law.
- Lawrence DeBrock
Lawrence DeBrock
Lawrence DeBrock is Professor Emeritus of Finance and Dean Emeritus at the Gies College of Business of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He has served as a consultant and expert to several public panels as well as foreign governments. He has published numerous articles in economics journals such as the Review of Economics and Statistics, the Bell Journal of Economics, the International Journal of Industrial Organization, the Journal of Law and Economics, the Journal of Labor Economics, and the Journal of Human Resources. Professor DeBrock received his B.S. from Bradley University and his M.A. and Ph.D. from Cornell University.
- Robert E. Elworth
Robert E. Elworth
Robert E. Elworth is a Partner at HeplerBroom LLC in Chicago, where he concentrates his practice on the defense of complex liability claims. He has served as an instructor of business law and environmental law at Roosevelt University in Chicago. He is a member of the Appellate Lawyers Association, the Defense Research Institute (DRI), and the Illinois Association of Defense Trial Counsel. He is admitted to practice law in Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Nebraska, Texas, and Wisconsin. Mr. Elworth received his B.A. from the University of Nebraska and his J.D. from the Creighton University School of Law.
- Connor W. Fitch
Connor W. Fitch
Connor W. Fitch is an associate at Brown, Hay + Stephens, LLP, in Springfield, where he focuses on civil litigation. Mr. Fitch received his J.D. from the Southern Illinois University Simmons Law School.
- Lucas J. Hall
Lucas J. Hall
Lucas J. Hall is an associate at Brown, Hay + Stephens, LLP, in Springfield, where he focuses on civil litigation. Mr. Hall received his J.D. from the University of Illinois College of Law.
- Lawrence R. Kream
Lawrence R. Kream
Lawrence R. Kream is the owner of the Law Office of Lawrence R. Kream, L.L.C., in Chicago, where he focuses on medical and other professional negligence, product liability, and construction injuries. He is a member of the Illinois State Bar Association, Medical Negligence and Amicus Curiae Committees of the Illinois Trial Lawyers’ Association, and the Amicus Curiae Committee of the American Association of Justice. He is an adjunct professor at the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law. Mr. Kream received his J.D. with distinction from the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law.
- Jeffrey J. Kroll
Jeffrey J. Kroll
Jeffrey J. Krollis a Partner at Kaveny + Kroll in Chicago, where he concentrates his practice in personal injury and wrongful death. He has been named to the Illinois Super Lawyers list since 2005 and has been named one of the Top 100 Trial Lawyers in Illinois by the American Association for Justice (formerly ATLA) for ten consecutive years. Mr. Kroll received his B.A. from DePaul University and his J.D. from the DePaul University College of Law.
- Charles M. Linke
Charles M. Linke
Charles M. Linke is a Professor Emeritus of Finance at the Gies College of Business of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He has served the University as the IBE Distinguished Professor of Finance, Chair of the Department of Finance, and Associate Dean for Graduate Studies. A contributor to numerous treatises and journals, he is a member of academic and professional organizations including the American Economics Association, the American Finance Association, the American Risk and Insurance Association, and the National Association of Forensic Economists. Professor Linke received his B.S., his M.B.A., and his D.B.A. from Indiana University.
- Ryan W. Mucci
Ryan W. Mucci
Ryan W. Mucci is an associate at HeplerBroom LLC in Chicago, where he focuses on medical malpractice defense. He is a member of the Illinois Bar Association and the Chicago Healthcare Risk Management Society. Mr. Mucci received his B.A. from Villanova University and his J.D. cum laude from the DePaul University College of Law.
- Andrew C. Patton
Andrew C. Patton
Andrew C. Pattonis a Partner at Franco Moroney Buenik LLC in Chicago, where he focuses on commercial litigation and tort defense, with an emphasis on construction litigation, including breach of contract; construction and design defect, delay/impact, and personal injury; insurance coverage; transportation litigation, including trucking and railroads; maritime litigation; business disputes; professional liability claims; and catastrophic injury defense. He practices in both state and federal courts throughout the United States and has tried numerous cases to verdict. He has been repeatedly recognized as an Illinois Super Lawyer in the area of construction litigation. Mr. Patton received his B.A. from Boston College and his J.D. from the Indiana University Maurer School of Law.
- Mikayla S. Young
Mikayla S. Young
Mikayla S. Young is an associate attorney at Franco Moroney Buenik LLC in Chicago. Her professional interests span several critical areas of law, including tort defense, employment law, insurance defense, and medical malpractice. She is an avid advocate for continuous learning and community engagement. She actively contributes to legal forums and remains committed to staying at the forefront of emerging trends within the legal landscape. Ms. Young received her B.S. from the University of South Florida and her J.D. from the University of Kentucky Rosenberg College of Law.
Proving and Disproving Damages in Personal Injury Cases 2024 Edition
An IICLE® Online Library subscription is required to view this content. For more information or to subscribe, click here.
Free monthly e-updates in 15 practice areas